browsing for youtube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYEg5CTIzPA) I wanted to see the clash Santanchè-Vauro. I had no particular bias. Indeed I had some distrust of Vauro sometimes a bit 'too heavy with that pencil. The sticker
offending, the one with the coffins, I had also left doubtful even before the controversy. It must be said that the impact assessment of the satire is not always easy and there were perhaps an apology.
When I saw how the verbal violence Santanchè made his debut in front of Gruber and moderate tone and controlled responses of Vauro that I could not embrace the cause of the cartoonist. You may be convinced of any likely cause but the tone of politics is, in my opinion, inappropriate for a community representative. These are the people who represent us. The finding of
Santanchè about the amount of compensation would say that the designer, said by she has no sense. The term "steal" used was very inappropriate for a contract. Obviously he knows nothing of the prices of established graphic. Vauro I would consider extremely cheap, considering the rates that you see around the brain and many show little legs.
And when it is free from conditioning and cameras that do this? Tira slopes (with heels) to the party?
0 comments:
Post a Comment